Legal Opinion

Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 14, 1944No. 5976; Entry Nos. 718987 and 718994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement involves the value of certain chinaware and earthenware articles. At the trial the parties hereto agreed to the following statement of facts:

1. That the merchandise involved is earthenware and chinaware, consisting of tableware and so-called fancy articles exported from Birmingham, England, on September 16, 1941.

2. That the entered value of such merchandise is the export value thereof as defined in Sec. 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

3. That the appraisement of said merchandise by the appraiser was made on the basis of the foreign…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raphael Weill & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. W. R. Zanes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API