Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Stores, Inc. v. Summers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1964No. 23901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Stores, Inc., began this litigation with a replevin action against defendants for the recovery of photographic equipment which plaintiff had sold to defendants. This equipment originally cost more than $13,000 and there was a balance due of $11,400. Defendants counterclaimed, alleging breach of warranty and asking damages. The replevin action was tried to the Court and terminated in a judgment for plaintiff, from which no appeal has been taken. The counterclaim for damages was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for defendants in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Middlewest Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Martin v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Allen v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,534 United States of America v. John Dioguardi and Louis OstrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Woodruff v. Clark County Farm Bureau Cooperative Assoc., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API