Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Steffen

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1997No. 49A02-9508-CV-449PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Appellants Otis P. Johnson (Johnson) and Roberta Ruth Johnson (collectively, the Johnsons) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees Mark Steffen (Steffen), Catsports, Tuxedo Brothers, Inc. (Tuxedo Brothers), Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (Anheuser-Busch) and Triathlon Federation/USA (the Triathlon Federation). The Johnsons present two issues for our review, one of which is dispositive: Whether the Fireman’s Rule applies to bar Johnson’s claim.1

We reverse.

*1118FACTS

Johnson, an Indianapolis city police officer for over 83 years, was assigned to work…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Heck v. RobeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Crist v. K-Mart Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Koehn v. DevereauxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Koop v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Babes Showclub, Jaba, Inc. v. LairIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Creasy v. RuskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Babes Showclub v. LairIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Creasy v. RuskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Johnson v. SteffenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API