Legal Opinion

Hollandale Ice Co. v. Board of Sup'rs.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1934No. 31478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The Hollandale Ice Company, a partnership, appellant here, on January 1, 1927, applied to the attorney-general for an exemption from state and county ad valorem taxes under chapters 138 and 139, Laws 1922, and chapter 172, Laws 1926. This exemption was granted by the attorney-general and was filed for record in the office of the chancery clerk of Washington county on February 19, 1927. The board of levee commissioners gave notice to the county tax collector to have the property of the appellant assessed for levee taxes for the years 1927, 1928, 1929, and 1930. The tax assessor served notice,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ascher v. Edward Moyse & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Knox. v. Wyoming Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. WeinerMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Barrett v. Cedar Hill Consol. School Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. PiazzaMississippi Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Elephant Butte Irr. Dist. of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Clement v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ashcraft v. B'd. of Sup'vrs. Hinds Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Jackson v. SlyMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gully v. Memphis Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API