Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hyland v. Millers Nat. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1937No. 7937Published

1DissentHaney, Circuit Judge

(dissenting.)

I dissent.

The majority opinion in finding appellant guilty of fraud in a suit in equity make the statement that, “It -is fair to presume that the conspiracy began, if not before the fire, immediately afterwards.” I cannot subscribe thereto. A man is presumed to be innocent at all-times until his guilt is established. Likewise fraud is not presumed. The presumption made, I believe to be erroneous.

The majority deny recovery on one ground and then proceed to support that conclusion by reference to and discussion of an alleged second ground. If the first is sound, the second is…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Insurance Companies v. WeidesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Johnson v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Deitz v. Prov. Wash. Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Benedict Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API