Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 8, 1998No. 1-97-3754PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

After the State’s only eyewitness to the home invasion was questioned by the lawyers, the judge in this bench trial asked him questions about his ability to see without his glasses. Then the judge conducted a brief courtroom experiment. Minutes later, the judge found the defendant guilty.

The issue on appeal is whether, under the circumstances, the judge committed reversible error. We find he did not and we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.

FACTS

Defendant Benjamin Smith (Smith) was charged with home invasion and armed violence in connection with events that occurred on September…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. EylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. People v. CosbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. People v. AustinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. People v. MaherAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API