Legal Opinion

Witt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 24, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oi? the» Court by

Commissioner Sandidge

Affirming.

Appellants, O. W. Witt and others, own a farm in Estill county, Kentucky, containing something over 400 acres. The tracks of appellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, traverse that farm. They sued to compel it to re-establish a farm crossing and a station on the farm which they alleged it had wrongfully discontinued and to compel it to erect certain fences. Alternatively they pleaded that, in the event they were not entitled to that relief, they were entitled to damages in the sum of $5,000.00. Appellants had purchased the farm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eli v. TrentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Payne v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Cincinnati Southern Railway Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  4. McGurn v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schimmelfennig v. Grove Farm Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Howard v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API