Crosby v. Avon Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal. The sole issue raised by the appellant is whether the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside a default judgment. We affirm.
Crosby suffered an allergic reaction to cologne which was manufactured by Avon. He brought an action against Avon based on the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine and for breach of implied warranty of merchantability. On April 22, 1982, Crosby attempted to serve Avon by having a process server deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to the offices of a firm called Answering-Mobile. Prior to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cockrell v. World's Finest Chocolate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Fisher v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Frazier v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
3Cited by11 opinions
- Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Kmart Corp. v. KylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Coulter v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Hobart Corp. v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Hill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.