Legal Opinion · Dissent

D.M.J. v. D.N.J.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 27, 2012No. 2101079Published

1DissentThomas, Judge

I respectfully dissent. My review of the record does not lead me to the determination that the evidence before the trial court supports its conclusion that a modification of the parties’ joint-custody arrangement, which our legislature requires us to favor, was warranted. Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3-150.3 I do not agree that, in this case, the trial court could have “inferred” that D.N.J. (“the father”) had offered proof to the trial court of a material change of circumstances affecting the best interest and welfare of the child.

The majority of this court is convinced that the father presented…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Ex Parte PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte CouchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Patchett v. PatchettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. C.M.M. v. S.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API