D.M.J. v. D.N.J.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentThomas, Judge
I respectfully dissent. My review of the record does not lead me to the determination that the evidence before the trial court supports its conclusion that a modification of the parties’ joint-custody arrangement, which our legislature requires us to favor, was warranted. Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3-150.3 I do not agree that, in this case, the trial court could have “inferred” that D.N.J. (“the father”) had offered proof to the trial court of a material change of circumstances affecting the best interest and welfare of the child.
The majority of this court is convinced that the father presented…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte CouchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Patchett v. PatchettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- C.M.M. v. S.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.