Legal Opinion
Salt Lake City v. Piepenburg
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1977No. 14688Published
1Opinion of the Court
571 P.2d 1299 (1977)
SALT LAKE CITY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
James D. PIEPENBURG, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 14688.
Supreme Court of Utah.
October 28, 1977.
Bruce C. Lubeck, John D. O'Connell, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.
Roger F. Cutler, Salt Lake City Atty., Paul G. Maughan, Asst. Salt Lake City Atty., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
ELLETT, Chief Justice:
The appellant operates a film theatre and was charged with and convicted of the crime of exhibiting an obscene motion picture. The charge was made under a city ordinance and conviction had in the City Court. An…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.