Fischer v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
EbboR to review a judgment of the municipal court for the eastern district of "Waukesha county: D. S. Tullar, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtOassodat, C. J.
The plaintiff in error has been convicted of having, on February 23, 1898, committed the offense de*24scribed by tbe statute which, declares that “ auy person who by threats, intimidation, force or coercion of any kind shall hinder or prevent any other person from engaging in or continuing in any lawful work or employment either for himself or as a wage-worker, or who shall attempt to so hinder or prevent, shall be punished,” etc. Stats. 1898, sec. 4466c.
1. Counsel contend that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Of course, the complaint must state the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kerrains v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- McKown v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Seymour v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Wilson v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Steuer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Allis-Chalmers Co. v. Iron Molders' Union No. 125U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1906
- People v. WashburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Hanley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Twentieth Century Co. v. QuillingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.