State v. Hemby
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
The issue before us is whether the trial court violated the Fair Sentencing Act in a resentencing proceeding by imposing upon defendant more severe sentences than were imposed originally. Although defendant’s total number of years of imprisonment remained the same, the number of convictions for which he was resentenced had been reduced. Considering each conviction separately for sentencing purposes, we conclude that the trial court violated the Fair Sentencing Act by resentencing defendant to a term of years for each conviction that exceeded the sentence given for each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. SkipperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. NixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. MaraHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.