Legal Opinion

Specht v. Stoker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 2, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

In the summer of 1946 appellants entered into a written lease with appellee, by the terms of which they leased to appellee for a period of five years a portion of 'premises which they owned. We are particularly concerned with the following provisions in the lease: “The premises shall not be underlet, or the' term, in whole or in part, assigned, transferred, or set over by the act ,of the lessee, by process or operation of law, or in any other manner whatsoever, without the written consent of the lessor, and for a violation of this stipulation, in addition to the forfeiture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StumboCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Cities Service Oil Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Murray v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Khourie Bros. v. JonakinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Rich v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. of Georgetown v. Willmott Hardwoods, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. of Georgetown v. Willmott Hardwoods, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. GPH Louisville Hillcreek, LLC v. Redwood Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  4. Specht v. StokerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API