Legal Opinion

Worden v. Humeston & Shenandoah Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Page District Court. — Hon. C. P. Looebourow, Judge. Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff’s intestate while employed by defendant as an. engineer, which resulted in his death, and were occasioned by defendant’s negligence. There was a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

4. Railroads: death of engineer by derailment: evidence of negligence. — I. The point most elaborated by plaintiff’s counsel is that the verdict fails of support in the evidence. The accident in which the intestate was injured was the derailment of the engine upon which he was employed. There was evidence tending to show that the *312accident was caused by a defect in the track, — a depression which, caused such rocking and swaying of a train passing over it as to attract the attention of and alarm persons riding on the train. This defect had existed for three days, at least, before the accident,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Shover v. MyrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Bixby v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Scagel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API