Darnell Bridges v. John Chambers
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The state in this federal habeas corpus proceeding has asked us to substitute the director of the Illinois Department of Corrections for the named respondent, who is the warden of the prison in which the petitioner is imprisoned. The state says that “naming [the director] would be more efficient. If the respondent is the warden of the particular institution in which the petitioner is incarcerated, the replacement of the warden, or the transfer of the petitioner to a different Illinois state institution, will require substitution of the respondent. By contrast, if the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Arkadiy L. Kholyavskiy v. Deborah Achim, Alberto R. Gonzales, and Michael ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Rolando Araujo, Jr. v. Nedra Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Juan Reyes v. Mindi NurseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Flynn v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Akers v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.