Legal Opinion

BrandAid Marketing Corp. v. Biss

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 2005No. 03 Civ. 5088(WHP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAULEY, District Judge.

This action arises out of an alleged sale of the stock of the plaintiff BrandAid Marketing Corporation (“BrandAid”) to defendant Cyberian Enterprises, Ltd. (“Cyberi-an”). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. This Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. As the finder of fact, this Court limits its discussion to the testimony and exhibits that it credits. That task is particularly daunting here because each party deceived the other in their dealings, and that modus operandi also permeated the trial.

2Cases cited8 opinions

Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Stone v. FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
Ross v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
Samuel Peltz v. Shb Commodities, Inc., Isaac Mayer, Solomon Mayer, and Bezalel MayerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Verestar, Inc. v. American Tower Corp. (In Re Verestar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006