Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Ridley Township
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 1944No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This is an appeal by George Harvey from the order of the court below quashing a petition and an amendment thereto for the appointment of a jury of view to assess the amount of consequential damages sustained by him as a result of the construction of a sewer in the Township of Ridley, a first class township. Appellant contends that the legislature has provided for the recovery of consequential damages by Section 2440(d) of the Act of 1931, P. L. 1206, as amended by the Act of 1935, P. L. 22.
Section 2440(d) of the Act of 1931, P. L. 1206, as amended by the Act of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Soldiers and Sailors Memorial BridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- County of Chester v. BrowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Dailey v. Potter CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- McGarrity v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Appeal of County of DelawareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atlantic Pipe Line Company v. Dredge PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Spidle v. Livingston Const. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bear Creek Realty Co. Petition, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1956
- Commonwealth v. Regan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1984
- Commonwealth v. Shelley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.