Legal Opinion

Bell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1965No. 51538PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, J. —

After taking her appeal in this case, the plaintiff found it convenient to pay the cost judgment which had been entered against her when she lost in the trial court. So we are forced to the conclusion and holding that, whatever merit her case may have had, it has been lost by her acquiescence in the judgment from which she seeks to appeal.

Mrs. Bell suffered a fall while shopping in the defendant’s place of business, on July 27, 1962. She alleged this was due to a wet and slippery substance on the floor and to the defendant’s various negligences in permitting it to remain there.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Bates v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Bull v. Doss Bros. Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Credit Industrial Company v. BendixenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Union County Board of Review v. Hotel Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kenney v. HaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Dubuque v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Ames General Contractors, Inc. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API