Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Gill

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1991No. Nos. 91-CA-404 to 91-CA-406Published

1Opinion of the Court

GOTHARD, Judge.

This consolidated case arose originally from a three-car accident. Three third party insurer defendants have been dismissed by the district court and the dismissals have been affirmed by this court.1 The present appeal is from summary judgment in favor of General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) for the balance of a promissory note, made by Russell S. Gill in payment for a Buick, and recognizing its security interest in the automobile.

The issue before us is whether summary judgment was appropriate in this case.

La.C.C.P. art. 966 provides for summary judgment as follows, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API