Legal Opinion

Riggins v. Housing Authority

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1976No. 43854PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

The Housing Authority of Seattle appeals from a summary judgment based on stipulated facts entered by the parties. The facts as pertinent to this appeal are the following.

The appellant Housing Authority of Seattle administers a federally assisted, low rent housing program. Prior to 1974, it did not consider age in determining eligibility and, in fact, it undoubtedly rented to some minors who were eligible for public housing. In 1974, however, it formally considered whether or not under applicable federal regulations it should be entering into leases with minors. Since that time, appellant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Grays Harbor Paper Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SponburghWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Dawes v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Standow v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hanselman v. Wayne County Concealed Weapon Licensing BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Benson v. Fort Dodge Police Pension Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API