Legal Opinion

Norris v. McGaffick

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 3, 1866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ajypeal from Mahaslea District Go%urt. This is a controversy submitted to the District Court without action, under the provisions of chapter 131 of the Revision of 1860.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

i. desceñíIrantee The following is, in substance, the agreed statement of facts: George Fent and Philip Fent were ^e owners of one hundred and sixty acres of land in Mahaska county. In March, 1850, Philip Fent died intestate, leaving Matilda Fent, his widow, and George W. Fent, his only child. Afterward Matilda Fent and Henry MeGaffick married, and are still husband and wife; that no proceedings to allot dower Were ever had, but a partition was had between George Fent and George W. Fent, whereby a certain eighty acres were allotted to George W. Fent; that in October, 1862, George W. Fent died…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Hounchin v. SalyardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Ward v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API