Caron v. Powers-Simpson Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to. recover $20,410 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Dibell, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favór of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant Powers-SimpsoniCompany appealed.
1Per curiam
In this case an appeal was previously taken from an order granting a motion for a new trial after a jury had rendered a verdict for defendant. This court affirmed the order of the trial court. 96 Minn. 192, 104 N. W. 889. The court there expressed the opinion that defendant’s contention that the facts did not show actionable negligence on *342the part of the defendant, but did show assumption and appreciation of risk by the plaintiff, should not be sustained. Upon the new trial plaintiff had a verdict. This appeal was taken from the order denying the alternative motion for judgment for defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Caron v. Powers-Simpson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905