Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Juvenile Appeal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 31, 1982No. Docket No. 10718Published

1DissentShea, J.

I disagree with the majority’s view that the intervention of the foster parents as parties in the parental termination proceeding denied the respondent a fair hearing. I am, therefore, unable to concur that a new trial, at which the foster parents may be present only as witnesses or observers, is necessary.

I have no quarrel with the majority’s view that the permissibility of intervention by foster parents in a custodial placement or revocation proceeding; General Statutes § 46b-129(i); does not mandate the same result in a parental termination hearing. I am not convinced, however, that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Fitch v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
  3. Hurd v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Merwin v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
  5. Wood v. Connecticut Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API