In re Juvenile Appeal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentShea, J.
I disagree with the majority’s view that the intervention of the foster parents as parties in the parental termination proceeding denied the respondent a fair hearing. I am, therefore, unable to concur that a new trial, at which the foster parents may be present only as witnesses or observers, is necessary.
I have no quarrel with the majority’s view that the permissibility of intervention by foster parents in a custodial placement or revocation proceeding; General Statutes § 46b-129(i); does not mandate the same result in a parental termination hearing. I am not convinced, however, that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Fitch v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
- Hurd v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Merwin v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Wood v. Connecticut Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.