Legal Opinion

Viersen v. Stanfill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1952No. 35152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Plaintiffs in error have appealed from a judgment against them in the trial court and on September 28, 1951, filed their brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Fore v. Fore, 203 Okla. 75, 218 P. 2d 366, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon *185which to sustain the action of the trial crurt, but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fore v. ForeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mulkey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API