Jena Band of Choctaw Indians v. Tri-Millennium Corp.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Ruling 1
LITTLE, District Judge.
Before the court are two motions filed by Defendants, Tri-Millennium Corporation, Inc. (“Tri-Millennium”) and BBC Entertainment, Inc. (“BBC”). First, on 23 June 2004, Defendants filed Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment. Then, on 23 July 2004, a second Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment was filed. Each of Defendants’ motions is predicated upon the pen-dency of the related state court action or, in the alternative, the settlement agreements entered into by the parties in connection with the state court action, both…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- S.E.C. v. RecileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Kelty v. BrumfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n v. Lake of the Torches Economic Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. Shingle Springs Band Indians, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Sharp Image Gaming v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok IndiansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017