Legal Opinion

Klimek v. Borkowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1932No. Calendar 36,398PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is habeas corpus with accompanying certiorari to test commitment of defendant for contempt in disobedience of a decree for payment of money.

Plaintiff resided in Poland and her husband in Detroit. He, ill at defendant’s home, made change of beneficiary in a policy of life insurance for $2,000, naming defendant instead of plaintiff. Defendant received the $2,000, paid funeral expenses and other charges in connection with the death and burial, in all the sum of $600. She also used practically all of the remainder of the fund in paying other bills of herself or her husband.

Upon bill, answer,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haines v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Carnahan v. CarnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. The People v. LamotheIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. North v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Swarthout v. LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. McCartneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Balmer v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API