MATTER OF VETTER v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by remitting to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.
Petitioner David Vetter was employed for the 2005-2006 school year as a probationary teacher by respondent Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Central School District. On June 21, 2006, respondent Board of Education voted to terminate petitioner as of July 21, 2006 based on allegations of misconduct. The Board did not provide petitioner with written notice of its action until almost a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Tucker v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Zunic v. NyquistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Zunic v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Vetter v. Board of Education, Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New York State Defenders Ass'n v. New York State PoliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kahn v. Department of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Matter of Clarke v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Criss v. New York State Dept. of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Swergold v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.