Legal Opinion

Stoll Oil Refining Co. v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 3, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Judge.

This is a motion for appeal pursuant to RCA 1.180, from a judgment entered by the Green Circuit Court. It is the second appearance of this case on our docket. In the first opinion (Stoll Oil Refining Company v. Pierce, Ky., 337 S.W.2d 263, 266) we held that:

“Nominal damages are all the plaintiff was entitled to recover. The court should have so instructed the jury. Upon the return of the case, the court will award nominal damages to the plaintiff.”

On return, both parties moved that the court enter a judgment pursuant to the opinion and mandate.

The court entered a judgment in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Lucas v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Stoll Oil Refining Company v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Heath v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
  5. Hasselbusch v. MohmkingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. BroughtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Young v. Vista Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  3. Mo-Jack Distributor, LLC v. Tamarak Snacks, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
  4. Cherry v. AugustusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  5. Tavadia v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API