Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Plymouth Township School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1909No. Appeal, No. 42PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 42, March T., 1909, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., May T., 1906, No. 147, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Joshua D. Cooper v. The School District of Plymouth Borough. Assumpsit for material and labor furnished to a school building. Before Fuller, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $345. Defendant, appealed. Error assigned was in giving binding instructions for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The plaintiffs statement set out an employment by the defendant to furnish materials and do repairing to certain school*487houses in the township of Plymouth, such as fixing the floors, windows, and doors, and other like work, together with' a promise by the defendant to pay therefor. The defendant did not offer any testimony. Subsequent to the work being done, the school board, at a regular session, considered the bill as presented by the plaintiff, and unanimously voted an approval of it by directing that an order be drawn on the treasurer for the amount of $250, which was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weir v. Plymouth BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Rothwell v. California BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Oakley v. Luzerne BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. Taylor Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Busse v. Center Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API