Legal Opinion
Jeffries v. Blodgett
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 5, 1991No. C90-925DPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DIMMICK, District Judge.
Petitioner, in addition to filing a memorandum in opposition to respondent's motion for summary judgment, has filed separate motions for: (1) additional discovery, (2) expansion of the record, and (3) an evidentiary hearing on certain issues raised in his request for habeas corpus relief. On March 13, 1991, the Court heard oral argument on these motions and on the question of whether certain claims made by the peti tioner in his habeas corpus petition are precluded from federal court review. The Court has reviewed the memoranda and affidavits submitted by counsel…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.