Legal Opinion

Eldridge v. Marshall National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 30, 1975No. 1073PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUNKS, Chief Justice.

This is a will construction case. The district court rendered a summary declaratory judgment upon the motion of the Attorney General of Texas, construing the will to establish a charitable trust and holding that all property remaining after specific legacies and bequests passed to the trust under the will. Appellants, Fred R. Eldridge, et al. (the heirs), appeal from the granting of the summary judgment in favor of appel-lees and from the denial of their motion for summary judgment that the charitable trust provisions of the will were invalid.

Hope Pierce Tartt died on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Russell v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Boyd v. Frost National Bank of S.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Powers v. First Natl. Bank of CorsicanaTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Tyner, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  2. Executors of the Estate of Tartt v. HarpoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Marsh v. Frost National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. Bode v. LoefflerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Anna Spohn Welch Marsh, Noe Marsh, and Holly McKee v. Frost National Bank, as Independent of the Estate of Charles Vartan Walker, and Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API