Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Ryan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1986No. C5-86-508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment and decree of dissolution awarding respondent physical custody of the parties’ minor child, subject to reasonable visitation. Appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion in awarding respondent physical custody and failing to order a structured visitation schedule. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant William J. Ryan and respondent Gayle M. Ryan were married in 1978. Their only child, Amanda, was bom May 26, 1981. The parties lived together until January 23, 1983, when respondent and Amanda moved out of the family home. Appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Marriage of Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Brauer v. BrauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API