Ryan v. Ryan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment and decree of dissolution awarding respondent physical custody of the parties’ minor child, subject to reasonable visitation. Appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion in awarding respondent physical custody and failing to order a structured visitation schedule. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant William J. Ryan and respondent Gayle M. Ryan were married in 1978. Their only child, Amanda, was bom May 26, 1981. The parties lived together until January 23, 1983, when respondent and Amanda moved out of the family home. Appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Marriage of Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Brauer v. BrauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marriage of Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987