Ledford v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
Each motion for a change of venue in these cases was based upon two grounds: (1) danger of mob violence against movant, and (2) inability of obtaining an impartial jury in the county where the crime was alleged to have been committed.
As to the first contention the rule is that if the evidence in support of the motion shows a reasonable probability of mob violence being committed against a defendant in the county where the crime was allegedly committed, it is mandatory for the presiding judge to grant the motion. Kennedy v. State, 141 Ga. 314 (80 SE 1012); Graham v. State, 141…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carmichael Tile Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Huguley v. HuguleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Douglas County v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970