Legal Opinion

United States v. Tavares

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 20, 1959No. 10,214PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

HOMER FeRGüson, Judge:

Accused was found guilty of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 920, and sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for ten years. By way of stipulation, the testimony of a psychiatrist was received in mitigation. This testimony was to the effect that the psychiatrist had found the accused to be:

“. . . [L]egally sane, i.e. he knows right from wrong and is able to adhere to the right, his moderately mixed-up condition is such that his ability to adhere to the right is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hysler v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Taylor v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. In re ErnstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Smith v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Strang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. FrischholzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. ReddingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. O'CallahanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. Johnson v. United StatesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API