Legal Opinion

Roman Perales v. Board of Law Examiners of the State of Texas Rachael Martin Carol Smoot The Supreme Court of Texas Chief Justice Thomas Phillips And Warlick Carr

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 17, 1995No. 03-94-00377-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

cv4-377.PERALES

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-94-00377-CV

Roman Perales, Appellant

v.

Board of Law Examiners of the State of Texas;

Rachael Martin; Carol Smoot; The Supreme Court of Texas;

Chief Justice Thomas Phillips; and Warlick Carr, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 93-06598, HONORABLE PETE LOWRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

2Per curiam

Roman Perales, who narrowly missed a passing score on the Texas bar examination, challenged the method of calculating bar examination scores as unauthorized, unconstitutional, and discriminatory. He sued the Board of…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Medina Lake Protection Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Sullivan v. University Interscholastic LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Risk Managers International, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Bullock v. Regular Veterans Ass'n of the U.S., Post No. 76Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API