Legal Opinion

Leet v. City of Eastlake

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1966No. 815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment of the Court of Common Pleas holding that Section 1340.06 of the Ordinances of the city of Eastlake (hereinafter referred to as Section 1340.06) embodies a valid exercise of the police power of the municipality, and denying a temporary injunction pending the determination of the validity of this ordinance.

At the outset, it must be stated that the pleadings show that the primary relief sought in this action was the interpretation of an ordinance, and that the temporary injunction prayed for in the trial court was only incidental to the primary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burk v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. State, Ex Rel. Urschel v. Coller, Aud.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Pepper Pike v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. Kenmore Demolition Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. City of Cincinnati v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API