Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Husband and Wife. Parties. Actions. Before Judge Dorsey. City Court of Atlanta. December Term, 1883, Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

Matilda Dorsey brought suit against the city of Atlanta for damages, for injuries to her person by falling into an *480opening in the sidewalk on one of the streets of the city, which, she alleged, was negligently uncovered and unguarded. On the trial, the evidence of plaintiif showed that she was a married'woman, living with her husband at the time of the accident, when suit was brought, and at the time of the trial.

’ When this evidence came out, by consent of counsel, the case was suspended and a motion made for a non-suit on the evidence then in, on the ground that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Heyman v. HeymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Tingle v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Sessions v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Mayor & Council of Athens v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API