Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Intex Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 20, 1985No. 0475Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is a declaratory judgment action to determine ownership of two patents. The circuit court ordered that respondent J. Carroll Rushing assign his title to the patents to appellant Intex Products, and that Intex pay Rushing one-third of all remunerations it receives from commercializing the patents. Intex appeals and contends the court erred in ordering it to share proceeds from use of the patents with Rushing because Rushing did not plead facts upon which monetary relief could be granted. We agree and reverse and remand.

The case involves a dispute between Intex, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Bank of Augusta v. Satcher Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Langston v. NilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Collins Ex Rel. Estate of Collins v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API