Legal Opinion
Folck v. Khanzada
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 2012No. 2012-CA-18PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Folck v. Khanzada,
2012-Ohio-4971.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY NEAL C. FOLCK : : Appellate Case No. 2012-CA-18 Plaintiff-Appellant : : Trial Court Case Nos. 11-CVI-4004 v. : : ZAKIR KHANZADA : (Civil Appeal from Clark County : (Municipal Court) Defendant-Appellee : : ........... OPINION Rendered on the 26th day of October, 2012. ........... NEAL C. FOLCK, 4581 Jeremy Avenue, Springfield, Ohio 45502 Plaintiff-Appellant, pro se ZAKIR KHANZADA, 1016 Whispering Pines, Centerville, Ohio 45458 Attorney for Defendant-Appellee, pro se .............…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Freeman v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. West v. McDonnellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Huber Hts. Veterans Club, Inc. v. Grande Voiture D'Ohio La Societe Des 40 Hommes et 8 ChevauxOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Tennant v. Huntington Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Fleming v. WhitakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Horn v. CherianOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.