Sulkin v. Brooklyn Edison Co.

In the answer to the petition it is alleged that the respondent for a certain specified period furnished electricity to a store occupied by the petitioner; that the charge for this service has not been paid; that although the petitioner was the actual consumer of electricity and the real occupant of the said store, the application for the service was made by his wife; that because of the non-payment of the aforesaid charge, the electricity furnished *485by the respondent to the apartment occupied by the petitioner and his wife was discontinued. The affidavits submitted in opposition to this…