Benefield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Rudolph Benefield, filed a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition, making numerous claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, as well as various other allegations which, he maintains, entitle him to relief. The trial court's order, denying the petition, addressed only a portion of the appellant's ineffective assistance claims and failed to address any of the other claims. Therefore, the State requests that this Court remand the cause to the trial court so that that court can address the appellant's claim regarding trial counsel's alleged failure to perfect an appeal. In light of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ex Parte LandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Dobyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.