Legal Opinion

Urquiza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 2007No. 3D06-950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

971 So.2d 926 (2007)

Roberto URQUIZA, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-950.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 19, 2007.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, ROTHENBERG and LAGOA, JJ.

2Per curiam

Affirmed. The complained-of evidentiary rulings do not rise to the level of abuse of discretion. See Penalver v. State, 926 So.2d 1118, 1132 (Fla.2006) (stating that the admissibility of evidence falls…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penalver v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Reyes v. School Board of Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reyes v. School Board of Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Michel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API