People v. Long
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentColeman, C.J.
We respectfully dissent. The search of defendant’s vehicle and the seizure of the controlled substance did not violate the constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures, US Const, Am IV; Const 1963, art 1, § 11.
The facts are stated in the majority opinion. The majority opinion concludes that the officer’s actions in examining the interior of the vehicle constituted a warrantless search not authorized by Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1; 88 S Ct 1868; 20 L Ed 2d *474889 (1968). We agree that this issue is governed by the principles recognized in Terry.
I
In Terry, the Court upheld…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.