Legal Opinion

Simone v. Crans

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1994No. 92 CV 4340 (BDP)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PARKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs motion pursuant to Rule 59 (Fed.R.Civ.P.) to set aside the jury’s verdict with respect to damages is before this Court. The case was tried November 8, 1994 to November 14,1994. The jury found in plaintiffs favor against defendant Crans. Plaintiff moves to set aside the award as inadequate.

The amount of damages to be awarded is primarily a question of fact (see Duffy v. City of New York, 178 A.D.2d 370, 577 N.Y.S.2d 820 (1st Dept.1991)). Great deference must be accorded the interpretation of the evidence by the jury if there is present…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Halvorsen v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Duffy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Olszowy v. Norton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Hutchins v. GorlickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Marcus v. Zenith Travel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estevez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Fioto v. Manhattan Woods Golf Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
  4. Rounds v. Rush Trucking Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  5. Singh v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API