Legal Opinion
Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil Products
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 13, 1977No. 7818PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Signal Oil & Gas Co. (Signal) as plaintiff, brought this action for damages against Universal Oil Products Company (UOP), Procon, Inc. (Procon) and Alcorn Combustion Company (Alcorn) as defendants. Trial was by jury and judgment was rendered on the verdict that plaintiff take nothing as to all three defendants.
Signal and UOP entered into a contract for the construction of a refinery unit known as an isomax unit at the Signal refinery. UOP employed Procon to assemble the isomax unit. Procon ordered a part of the unit called a reactor charge heater from Alcorn. Alcorn…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Texsun Feed Yards, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Ralston Purina Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Pizza Inn, Inc. v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil ProductsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- JCW Electronics, Inc. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- JCW Electronics, Inc. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil ProductsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil ProductsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977