Legal Opinion

Silos v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided October 4, 2023No. 8:23-cv-00113Unknown

1Opinion

8:23-cv-00113-RFR-MDN Doc # 26 Filed: 10/04/23 Page 1 of 26 - Page ID # 171 Moving Party: DEFENDANT, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Phil Silos v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Case No. 8:23cv113 To assist the Court in more efficiently addressing the parties’ discovery dispute(s), the parties shall meet and confer, and jointly complete the following chart. The purpose of this chart is to succinctly state each party’s position and the last compromise offered when the parties met and conferred. The fully completed chart shall be e-mailed to chambers of the assigned magistrate judge. The moving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. St. John v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Klugel v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API