Ehrlich v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Levy and claim; from city court of Swainsboro — Judge Kirkland. June 28, 1920.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. The court did not err in admitting in evidence, over the objections of the claimant, the forthcoming bond given by the latter, or the entry of levy upon the distress warrant. This documentary evidence, while defective in some particulars, was sufficient to show the fact of levy, and was admissible for that purpose. Moreover, the claimant, having executed the forthcoming bond and thereby obtained possession of the property levied upon, was estopped from denying the fact of levy, or from asserting that for any reason the bond was invalid. Smith v. Davis, 3 Ga. App. 419 (60 S. E. 199) ; Smith…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Hartshorn v. Bank of GoughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Garner v. Clark Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Peeples v. Garrison & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ehrlich v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922