Pazol v. Tough Mudder Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs may not attempt to relitigate their claims that were already resolved in mediation. Instead, their remedy is to enforce the Settlement Agreement. Consequently, Counts I, II, III, and IV are dismissed.
b. Count VIII
Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgment that they may proceed with Counts I, II, III, and IV in court as a class rather than *197individually in arbitration. This Court has already upheld the arbitration agreement. See Pazol , 100 F. Supp. 3d 74. As have Massachusetts courts. See Pazol , 93 Mass. App. Ct. 1109, 103 N.E.3d 1237. As noted above, because there is no evidence that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Entrialgo v. Twin City Dodge, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Secure Our City, Inc. v. ECI Systems LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Valley Children's Hospital v. Athenahealth, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023