Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Bartow superior court. Action for personalty. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, C. J.

1. Where one corporation conveys its property to another, this alone does not destroy the corporate existence of the grantor or constitute a merger of the two corporations, or render the grantee subject to an action for damages for a tort previously committed by the grantor. The grantor is still subject to suit; and if liable, the question of seeking to subject property to such liability on a judgment rendered thereon is different from suing the grantee directly for the tort.(a) The deed from the A., K. & N. R. Co. to the L. & N. R. Co. was a conveyance of property, not a merger of corporate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlanta & Florida Railroad v. KimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Bentley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Cooper v. Dixie Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Quinan v. Standard Fuel Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Poss Bros. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API