Legal Opinion

Deas v. Rock Hill Printing & Finishing Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 29, 1933No. 13686PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The appellant brought action against Rock Hill Printing & Finishing Company and A. O. Joslin to recover damages for injuries to his lands, and other property rights, by polluting the waters of Fishing Creek which runs through appellant’s lands; which waters are used by appellant and his family for domestic purposes, for the watering of his live stock, for power for his grist mill and gin, and for like uses. He alleges that the pollution is caused by the printing & finishing company, of which A. O. Joslin is manager, discharging its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Little v. Robt. G. Lassiter & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Kahn v. Urania Lumber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Simon v. StrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Doctor v. Robert Lee, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Camp v. Petroleum Carrier Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API